By the time you get this newsletter, the public the Green space consultation meetings will have finished. Thank you for your letters, unfortunately due to the lack of space we can only publish one in this newsletter. The rest have been published on our website. We ask for your understanding.
“Further to Richard Pyle's missive (Issue 11), I disagree totally with the theorisations made.
1) it is stated that "there is a proven need for additional housing in Henbury and Brentry with 389 people on the Council Waiting list". So, where is the proof? I have not the slightest doubt that every area has a waiting list - most greater than this one. Moreover, there are many areas of the city that are derelict or semi-derelict (Stokes Croft, around Temple Meads and areas around the canal basin) that are crying out for redevelopment from their current appalling states. Why not use these areas for housing? 2) it is stated (without any proof being offered) that Henbury has "one of the largest elderly populations in the city". Yet, flats in Henbury specified for the over fifties cannot find tenants within this age group according to the Council. There appears to be a conflict of evidence here? 3) the previous housing development on Crow Lane Open Space was turned down by the Council on the grounds that the positioning was "isolated". Has the area suddenly become less isolated? 4) there is already a clinic and health centre which serves Henbury very well. Why spend yet more money reinventing the wheel?
5) is this the same Richard Pyle who supported the Wheels Park on Crow Lane Open Space? When this support was challenged, was it the same Richard Pyle who wrote that any noise from the Wheels Park was of no consequence as the adjacent flats were double glazed? If so, is it the case that people are not allowed to open their windows? 6)and lastly, the reality is that there will soon be no Open Space in Crow Lane with the planned supermarket destined to be there. This is undoubtedly going to cause severe traffic congestion - despite unsubstantiated claims to the contrary” Chris Cross, resident
“Chris is cross and wrong too. 1) Bristol City Council provides the official housing need figures not me , 2) Population age groups can be obtained from the last census 3) The housing application on the old swimming pool site was rejected as over intensive 4) Local health providers have been seeking a new site for a modern clinic, 5) At no stage did I say the Wheels Park was of no consequence to flat dwellers, 6) I believe that Crow Lane open space will stay an Open space” Richard Pyle answered.
We would like to thank Jenny for the support she has given to the newsletter group. We will miss you! Good luck , Jenny.
We would also like to thank all the people who are helping to deliver the newsletter. It’s a fantastic team!
Lastly, we would like to thank all the organizations who trust our newsletter with their adverts for their support.
We are very proud to welcome 2 more students to the group , Ryan and Tallen. They are willing to help with our website on the internet.
Do get in touch with us by emailing us at henburyandbrentrynewsletter@gmail.com or on mariannapaf@hotmail.com or by phoning to Marianna on 0117957032 or 0791337199.
If you would like to give us an article or your input for the next issue please send your email to
mariannapaf@hotmail.com or contact us on 07913037199 or 0117 9507032 before the
28th of February 2011.